I’ve done lots of work as a #DEI consultant, and heard all the associated complaints and fear-mongering, and the best response I ever heard was probably also the simplest:
“DEI is not lowering the bar, it is widening the gate.”
If you’re the best of the best, you’ll still rise to the top - all DEI does is allow everyone the opportunity to try. People who yell about DEI are simply announcing their insecurity about how their skills stack up in a larger pool.
mögen das
teilten dies erneut


hexaheximal
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •this is quite an interesting approach!
one thing I would suggest is using busybox's init system - it lets you get to a somewhat usable system with a tty login prompt using just a few files (/etc/inittab and some files in /etc/init.d)
blinry
Als Antwort auf hexaheximal • • •allison
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •blinry
Als Antwort auf allison • • •BenBE
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •skalabyrinth
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •Doing such a thing always was my dream!
(but ... well ... I have too little ressources)
draeath
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •if you ever want to peek further down the rabbit hole:
Build a 6502 computer
eater.netMomo
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •지지 ᚠד (Jiji Freya Daniel), 黄法官
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •u-root
u-rootSpaceLifeForm
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •How tiny?
I built a 1.44MB floppy with 5K of writeable storage.
Linux 2.4.18 (Iirc), Minix FS, Busybox, uClibc, legacy grub, a couple of NIC drivers, CDROM support.
I actually used it to rescue a headless router.
I still have it. Still works fine on old kit.
#Linux
Whitepaws &?🏳️🌈🇳🇱
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •Daniel Bohrer
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •As a bootloader you could try barebox (it's open source, and has a "menuconfig" too), which can be run from UEFI: barebox.org/doc/latest/boards/…
If I remember correctly, you can just put it as EFI/BOOT/BOOTx64.EFI on the system partition and UEFI will boot it by default. (Although writing that, that might even work with the bzImage directly too…?)
4.9. barebox on (U)EFI — barebox 2025.01.0 documentation
www.barebox.orgDaniel Bohrer
Als Antwort auf blinry • • •