Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


Als Antwort auf ElCanut

Are they protesting for something in particular or is it just a normal weekend in France?
Als Antwort auf lemmylommy

It part of the protesting movement against the megabassine in what protesters call now the "water war". The objective of this particular protest was to block the port of the city of La Rochelle which is considered by protester to enable the owner of the megabassine to do the business that require such a big use of water.
The mouvement has its own french wikipédia article . You can use a translator to learn more about it there.


Anyone else excited for / played Earthborne Rangers?


Waiting for it to be available in walk-in stores at a decent price, but it looks Solarpunk AF.


Solarpunk games?


I've taken a look at Anno 2070, Timberborn, and Terra Nil. Any other recommendations?
Als Antwort auf Armok: God of Blood

drivethrurpg.com/en/product/48…

coyoteandcrow.net/

Eta: posted too quickly, meant to say not video games but maybe worth a mention. I see fully automated on this community sometimes but I dont think I've seen coyote and crow talked about here.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf yngmnwntr

I hadn't heard of the first one before, but I actually own a copy of Coyote and Crow. Haven't gotten around to playing it yet.
Als Antwort auf Armok: God of Blood

There's but it's not released yet.


TIL of the text "bolo'bolo"


I was searching for the "definitive" solarpunk work and came across this as a recommendation to someone else. I'm not sure it fits the bill, but it's an interesting read nonetheless.
Als Antwort auf Armok: God of Blood

Read it in university. I like the societal picture they paint where everyone belongs to a different tribe and everything’s anarchy.


Has anyone attempted the bike setup from the Monk and Robot series?


The Monk and Robot books by Becky Chambers take place in a very solar punk setting where significant rewilding has taken place. The main character is a travelling tea monk (you don’t need to know what that is) who travels with what is called an ox-bike. Essentially the setup is an e-bike-driven lightweight campervan or possibly wagon. My impression from the book is that the front bike does not detach from the back.

I’ve done some literal back of the envelope calculations and I think it would be possible to make something like that in real life with our current technology. But I’ve not been able to find any prior art, except for the Wide path bicycle camper, which is more like a trailer than a campervan. My guess is you could improve on the if you made the bike built in, not least because it’s easier to stop without the damned bike falling over.

Have you ever heard of or seen anyone make something like this? Do you think it could work?

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf Amanda

There was this very cool handmade bike trailer wagon thing: slrpnk.net/post/1833883

For the artist's experiences living out of it: theaimlesslywanderingartist.bl…

But that's a trailer. It sounds like you're describing something closer to a Bicycle Rickshaw, possibly on a tricycle frame.

You could even do a recumbent bike:

It seems like either could be enclosed using techniques learned from popup campers for a fairly comfortable living space.

(I think a lot about all the crazy contraptions people would make if the roads weren't exclusively the domain of giant trucks and SUVs, and if cargo bikes didn't have to fit themselves into narrow bike lanes and roadsides. I think people would come up with some really cool and weird stuff. Add solar panels and ebike parts, and they'd get really interesting.)

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf Amanda

I'm pretty sure there is a part where they talk about the bike as separate from the wagon. Ah, here's the quote: "Mosscap nodded at the wagon trailing dutifully behind Dex’s ox-bike."


Solar PV on the roof of the Brighton Whitehawk public library


And yes, I know the shading isn't ideal...
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf poVoq

I'd be surprised if this installation generated anything useful at all, since shading any part of a single panel essentially disables the whole panel, which in turn, especially in small setups like this, affects the whole array of panels.
Als Antwort auf Onno (VK6FLAB)

Newer panels usually don't have that big of an issue with partial shading, but it definetly isn't optimal.
Als Antwort auf Steve

It's fascinating to see the difference in reaction in the post here, vs. the post it links to where they're saying exactly the same thing that you and I are saying.

No idea what the difference might be.

Als Antwort auf Onno (VK6FLAB)

Yea bypass diodes help a little, (and they have existed for a very long time, nothing to do with “modern” panels), but any shade effectively shuts down the entire panel, and unless the charge controller is happy with much lower voltage, the whole series string will stop producing.
Als Antwort auf Steve

Panel Level Optimization

Prevents a shaded panel from affecting the entire string. Pretty standard on Australian residential setups these days.

Als Antwort auf poVoq

With that much overgrowth, surely it'd be more ecological to just let it be plants?


"Growth capitalism is a deranged fantasy for lunatics" - an amazing rant on the "brutally efficient machine" of capitalist economics and the government policies facilitating it


Alternative link : pb.bloat.cat/anarchistmemecoll…
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)

Als Antwort auf Andy

The limiting factor in this is suitable soil. Converting a parking lot to a green space takes a bit of effort since soil has been removed to create it.
Als Antwort auf Track_Shovel

Absolute worst case, the pavement was used to cap a contaminated site (rather than excavate the contaminated soil and move it to a lined and capped landfill).
Als Antwort auf Andy

I love this kind of solarpunk art, showing largely practical reuse of existing buildings and infrastructure. Especially with the modifications to strengthen community and reduce car reliance.



Canvas 2024 is live! - Shall we try to draw the solarpunk logo?


What’s Canvas? Canvas is a collaborative pixel canvas similar to
Reddit’s r/place, except it is open to (almost) the entire Fediverse!
The event is going on from July 12th 4am UTC to July 15th @ 4am UTC (72 hours)

🌎 canvas.fediverse.events


We could try creating a template toast.ooo/post/3987393

UPDATE: I think I manged to create a template to follow. Click here and check if you see the solarpunk logo to the left of the big german lemmy. Help me draw it! 🌱 LINK TO TEMPLATE 🌱

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf vudu

I love the rainbow that's been added below, a lovely pair with our leaves


The Vaccine Test


Als Antwort auf Nyssa

I initially thought this was about anti-vaxxers, which is also a kind of test to weed out people prone to group-think and irrational believes.

But yeah, making and distributing vaccines is a reasonably complex tasks that requires some level of global coordination. However, classic vaccines are actually not all that hard to make, a lot of the complexity comes from the regulatory requirements. Early into the Covid-19 pandemic some people actually made their own nasal spray vaccines, that probably were not that much worse than some other early options.

Als Antwort auf poVoq

Ooooh interesting, good to know! I suppose inoculation is a process that is not particularly complex that a localized society could also achieve.


Do We Love Our Children


Presenter is not me, and I claim no credit, but wowzah Scott Galloway really crystalizes and cements some notions I've picked up from the punk side of solarpunk.
Als Antwort auf DadBear

Nah, this guy things pro palestinian protestors are anti-semites, and thinks andrew yang is a genius. maybe he's genuine but sounds like a grift, I mean he sells new age "how to feel happy" type books
Als Antwort auf MonkCanatella

on top of that, this whole plea to the rich fucks in the audience is just gonna make them think "you're right, I do need to think about my children. I better amass as much wealth as possible, so that no matter how fucked the world gets, my children in particular can buy their way to the best life."
Als Antwort auf jevans ⁂

Interesting perspective. I didn't hear that message at all, but rather that we need to seriously review who gets the lion's share of our (USA) state and federal taxes. I can see how the message you quoted could be extrapolated from his presentation, but it seems to me that it would be a misunderstanding of the goal of this presentation.
Als Antwort auf DadBear

It doesn't matter what he intended. It matters what actions his audience will take.
Als Antwort auf MonkCanatella

Thanks for the input. I'm largely unaware of his other work outside this Ted talk and one other interview on the same topic.

Als Antwort auf poVoq

Thanks for the reminder to look into whether my apartment permits this.


The current state of context resolution




Wau Holland – Alles ist eins, ausser der 0 (2021)

Am Anfang der Hacker-Kultur stand Deutschlands erster digitaler Bürgerrechtler: Wau Holland ist der Visionär einer demokratischen digitalen Kultur. 1981 gründete er mit einer Handvoll Mitstreitern den Chaos Computer Club (CCC), der durch spektakuläre Hacks und später durch Verstrickungen mit den Geheimdiensten weltbekannt wurde. (ARD)





Mike Macgirvin 🖥️ Mike Macgirvin 🖥️ wrote the following post Sun, 07 Jul 2024 14:00:35 -0700
@Streams

Announcing version 24.7.8 from the streams repository. "The best fediverse server you never heard of."

In this release:

nomadic identity over ActivityPub
nomadic content over all supported protocols
json-ld webpage metadata ("fediverse:creator" can rot in hell - we use and promote open standards here).

...and much more

codeberg.org/streams/streams

@Mike Macgirvin 🖥️


@Streams

Announcing version 24.7.8 from the streams repository. "The best fediverse server you never heard of."

In this release:

nomadic identity over ActivityPub
nomadic content over all supported protocols
json-ld webpage metadata ("fediverse:creator" can rot in hell - we use and promote open standards here).

...and much more

codeberg.org/streams/streams




Actual comedians try to use LLM in a writing room. Result: “cruise ship comedy material from the 1950s, but a bit less racist”


Als Antwort auf David Gerard

At the same time, most participants felt the LLMs did not succeed as a creativity support tool, by producing bland and biased comedy tropes, akin to ``cruise ship comedy material from the 1950s, but a bit less racist''.


holy shit that’s a direct quote from the paper



AI art steals from the poor and has no place in modern society


In a post-scarcity solarpunk future, I could imagine some reasonable uses, but that’s not the world we’re living in yet.


AI art has already poisoned the creative environment. I commissioned an artist for my latest solarpunk novel, and they used AI without telling me. I had to scrap that illustration. Then the next person I tried to hire claimed they could do the work without AI but in fact they could not.

All that is to say, fuck generative AI and fuck capitalism!

Als Antwort auf AEMarling

Tax all AI companies to fund UBI.

If we had representation...

Als Antwort auf aaaaace

"Ummm then we're not an AI company"

Land Value Taxes are better for this in literally every way.

Als Antwort auf explodicle

I like my idea because it will discourage greedy wasteful destructive nonsense and at least get something for public benefit.

Unlike extraction enterprises.

Money is what they listen to and worship. That's where it hurts.

Als Antwort auf aaaaace

If we want to address all of those, then we'll need higher pollution taxes too. Going after only one abstract category of greed will encourage them to bullshit it into another category.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf explodicle

We've needed those for decades, it needs to be very expensive.
Als Antwort auf explodicle

You're right. Don't tax entities that have massive sales but work out of a small office, like an AI powered company might

/s

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf psud

Like the Googleplex, or OpenAI's cheap San Francisco land.
Als Antwort auf AEMarling

If the AI isn't stealing content, then piracy isn't stealing either.
Als Antwort auf Colonel Panic

AI doesn't steal art. It creates new and unique images, it just uses existing art as inspiration... Like what real artist do.
Als Antwort auf SleezyDizasta

This is a deliberate misunderstanding I have seen repeatedly. They don't mean the AI stole art. They mean the training data used to train the ai stole art and is now being used to lever artists out of the workforce because it's cheaper.
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

The online scrapers just add whatever can be publicly viewed to their datasets. I fail to see how this is any different from actual artists going on the internet to view art to inspire and influence them. Regardless, what exactly do these artists demand? They can't fight technology and win, this is a futile battle that has been fought and lost many times before. AI art isn't going anywhere, it's here to stay and it'll only get better. No amount of anti-AI posts is going to change this. What exactly is the ultimate goal here?
Als Antwort auf SleezyDizasta

Als Antwort auf atrielienz

Als Antwort auf SleezyDizasta

Receiving stolen property is still a crime. You can't hire an independent contractor to draw you Disney characters and use the IP to make money. That's still illegal.
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

But that's not what these generative AIs do. They use actual content for training, but all generations are unique... Just like actual art
Als Antwort auf SleezyDizasta

If you go to college for art you are actively required to use specific licensed learning materials to learn from. They don't just go get random training material off the web and go "draw like this but make it your own". The same principles apply. The AI has no filters. It has no way of determining what is copyright infringement and what isn't. It can't decide what is fair use and what isn't.
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

But that's specific to universities as institutions, not art as a concept. There are plenty of artists without formal education that got inspiration from the things we saw. We could have a discussion about how internet scrapers get their data, however that's a different conversation. AI art isn't stealing content, it's using existing content (in albeit questionable ways) to generate new and unique content.
Als Antwort auf SleezyDizasta

Als Antwort auf atrielienz

my opinion is if I, as an artist, can look at publicly posted content and use that to inform my own unique work then why shouldn't an AI be able to? If I try to sell a drawing of bugs bunny, then WB can sue me, but I can sell as many bugs bunny inspired rabbit drawings as I want. That should be the rule for an algorithm too.
Als Antwort auf willie stedden

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

what I'm saying is that if the artwork is viewable in public, I have given the public license to hold that information in their brain and use it to influence their own output.

If a member of the public makes too similar of a replica then I can sue. We do not regulate the intake of public information into human storage/retrieval systems (brains) so why should we do that for synthetic ones?

We should only regulate the output to not reproduce art or an actors likeness etc.

Als Antwort auf willie stedden

If you go to college for art you are actively required to use specific licensed learning materials to learn from. They don't just go get random training material off the web and go "draw like this but make it your own". The same principles apply. The AI has no filters. It has no way of determining what is copyright infringement and what isn't. It can't decide what is fair use and what isn't.
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

the reason they have to use specific licensed material is because they are charging rhe art student and therefore must pay for the materials they provide to the student.

But as a student, you can look at any public art you want and allow it to inform your work as long as you don't copy. So that's another example of the same principle: you must pay to reproduce/distribute someone else's art for money. So we come to the same point: no reproduction, but intake is allowed.

Als Antwort auf willie stedden

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

let's look at writing computer code. LLMs used public copyrighted code to get really good at writing code blocks. That's like 85% of my job, but I don't care that they are making me obsolete because that means I can now spend more time figuring out how to do better science.

Artists should do the same. Anything that could be adequately created by thinking of a good text prompt should be done in 10 s and spend the rest of the time on hard creative stuff 🤷‍♀️

Als Antwort auf willie stedden

This is a terrible one to one comparison. I can't even begin to tear this apart it's so bad. LLM'S aren't even good at writing code which is like half the reason people have to go back and fix the code they generate.

Artists don't do art because it's work. They do art because they like to create things. You code because it's work which is why you don't care.

Als Antwort auf atrielienz

ok, this is just insulting. I write code ONLY because I want to create things. I have dozens of open source projects that I've built over the years. But I don't care about writing the code even though it's fun sometimes.

I write the code to create the thing. And if artists cared about creation they'd use whatever tool they could. The only reason to not want an AI alternative tool is to create a moat to keep getting paid for work that could be made cheaper.

Als Antwort auf willie stedden

You started with the insults when you basically claimed that artists should feel the way you do about writing code about making art. You know that's not how that works. If it makes things quicker for you, that's great. But making it "quicker" for the artist to make a piece isn't the same thing and it was disingenuous of you to claim otherwise. It's especially egregious considering that what's actually happening is non-artists are making "art" using LLM's and companies are buying that art because it's cheap thereby pushing real artists who actually are doing work out of the market entirely.

A cabinet maker might use a band saw to make his life easier but just having the band saw make the whole cabinet because it's faster? That's not how that works.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf atrielienz

so you said it right here: "...can’t just get a copy of the training materials used by Julliard and reproduce those exactly."

They can't reproduce, but if Juliard posted their materials online for free, then the professor at the community college could look at those materials and use that to inform their own material selection.

You are muddling up a bunch of random side issues rather than addressing the principle issue: anyone at any company can view public information.

Als Antwort auf willie stedden

You seem to think for free means just take it and use it to generate revenue. That's not what it means to have something be posted on the Internet. An artist's online portfolio isn't free. That's not how that's supposed to work and you know it.

If it were these LLM'S wouldn't shy away from using music on the Internet to train their LLM's. At least one of these firms has literally said they don't do this specifically because they don't want to get into trouble with any record labels. But sure. LLM'S can steal from Getty images and the NYT and be fine. That totally makes sense.

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf LainTrain

So don’t strengthen IP laws. Strengthen labor and antitrust laws.

Say: “You can’t use someone’s own creative work to compete against them in the same market”

Creators get a modicum of protection. The power-grab by the ultra-rich faces a major setback. FOSS models keep on truckin.

Als Antwort auf kibiz0r

Say: “You can’t use someone’s own creative work to compete against them in the same market”


So just IP laws then? Also would this not literally ban learning

Als Antwort auf LainTrain

Unlimited IP protections only benefit the rich. If we return copyright back to its original 25 year limit, it would actually benefit the actual artists because the corpos would have to pay artists for new ideas pretty frequently.
Als Antwort auf Duamerthrax

I really hope more people start believing this. Our current copyright system has been abused and bought by the rich and screws over both consumers and small artists, but "copyright of any form is terrible" is harmful to artists too.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)
Als Antwort auf AVincentInSpace

I don't care if it's harmful to artists. "Artist" is not a real job, it's something you nepo-babies can do in your free time outside of cooking McRibs or mining Lithium like the rest of working class folks.

I've never paid for digital content and I ain't about to start.

Als Antwort auf LainTrain

This is a joke. It has to be.

"Didn't you know the proletariat is supposed to be miserable?"

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)


A Rare Cross-Section Illustration Reveals the Infamous Happenings of Kowloon Walled City — Colossal


Full Image

Kowloon was built as a small military fort around the turn of the 20th century. When the Chinese and English governments abandoned it after World War II, the area attracted refugees and people in search of affordable housing. With no single architect, the urban center continued to grow as people stacked buildings on top of one another and tucked new structures in between existing ones to accommodate the growing population without expanding beyond the original fort’s border.

With only a small pocket of community space at the center, Kowloon quickly morphed into a labyrinth of shops, services, and apartments connected by narrow stairs and passageways through the buildings. Rather than navigate the city through alleys and streets, residents traversed the structures using slim corridors that always seemed to morph, an experience that caused many to refer to Kowloon as “a living organism.”

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)


Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 7 July 2024


Als Antwort auf Hirvox

I honestly went off M-Banks after finding out Bezos and Musk were huge fans. Bit unfair Banks is dead so he can't rip those assholes a new one. (wonder if Veppers in Surface Detail is inspired by one of them)
Als Antwort auf gerikson

Veppers was *totally* a vicious parody of Elon Musk. (Iain despised billionaires—in American political terms he was an unabashed communist.)


Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)


Solarpunk Pioneers Fund - The Idea


The Solarpunk Pioneers Fund is a private funding initiative with the goal to kickstart and fund solarpunk projects that develop solutions for a good and sustainable livestyle within the planetary boundaries.

We do this with private money that our family wants to invest into a better future, and we do this in our free time next to our day jobs. Hence, we want this project to develop organically, step by step, in exchange with the broader community.

Als Antwort auf poVoq

In the first pilot project 2024, the funding is only available to students of the Technische Hochschule Augsburg in the MSc program
Als Antwort auf poVoq

It's great to hear that "every outcome is open science / open source" with permissive licenses for the common good instead of a patent.

Continuing this theme, Liberapay would make sense as an option for contributing.



Naomi Klein: 'Let Them Drown: the violence of othering in a warming world'


n her 2016 Edward W. Said lecture, Naomi Klein examines how Said's ideas of racial hierarchy, including Orientalism, have been the silent partners to climate change since the earliest days of the steam engine, continuing to present day decisions to let entire nations drown and others warm to lethal levels. The lecture looks at how Said’s bold universalist vision might form the basis for a response to climate change grounded in radical inclusion, belonging and restorative justice.
Als Antwort auf quercus

Can't get behind the annoying sociology degree language. Even if the point is valid.
Als Antwort auf ex_06

I don't like the use of "othering" as a verb, basically. A girthy third of my MSc included swimming in the twat-infested waters of academic sociology so I feel I've earned my battle-scars in that respect. I once had a professor tell me "dams don't work, anyway" as a way of terminating a debate on the relocation of tribal communities in central India. The entire history of agriculture would seem to disagree with that assessment.
Als Antwort auf feedum_sneedson

How do you feel about "demonizing" or "dehumanizing"? Same concept, older lingo
Als Antwort auf yildolw

I think it's a bad thing, and those are the words I would use. Or something along those lines.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)



What Does a Solarpunk City Look Like?


teilten dies erneut




Als Antwort auf Condour75

If they got the money for it some good soil could be set out under the panels to cut food costs down as well, apparently there is a good variety of crops that perform well when given partial shading under panels.
Als Antwort auf PhlubbaDubba

central Australia is not known for it's arable land meowz, and they probably don't have an industrial grade water supply that could sustain it
Als Antwort auf Condour75

Man, assuming they have the money, indigenous tribes also in the US could do some amazing solarpunk shit. Renewable energy like this, rewilding and traditional sustainable land management, maybe even guaranteed housing in a communal setting. But they have a hard time getting the feds to give them the funding for the treaty-mandated healthcare shit as it is.


Als Antwort auf poVoq

I get your concern (this is the first time I'm hearing about it and oof). I would however point out that the core of transhumanism is the idea that we should have the freedom to modify our own bodies however we want. This is how I've always heard it used and how I'm going to keep using it.

I do understand where those people are coming from, though. If you have the technology to e.g. eliminate sickle cell anemia and choose not to do it, that's as much eugenics as choosing to do so. I don't know how to square that with individual liberty. Having parents decide is....not necessarily a great solution. Having society decide is also not a good solution, but probably the one we'll have to end up doing.



SolarPunk Cities: Our Last Hope? [18:34 Youtube vid]


Piped mirror: piped.video/watch?v=UVlBmdvIC6…

This channel is about architecture, and this video (from Nov 2023*) is about Solar Punk and covers some of the history and real-life attempts.

I was amused that shortly after talking about Solar Punk's rejection of consumerism she did the sponsor section, but that's Youtube for you.

* it's been posted elsewhere on Lemmy but not here that I can see

Als Antwort auf Deebster

I love this channel, I’ve being watching a bunch of their videos on architecture in the world/different concepts. Truly puts me down a few rabbit holes
Als Antwort auf O_i

I've only just found the channel, and am currently watching the one on . Glad to hear the quality's consistent.


Your Houseplants Can Think with Zoë Schlanger [Factually podcast with Adam Conover]


Adam's podcast is just straight-up low-key solarpunk at this point. Like half the videos feel relevant.

Here is the audio-only version, too: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/…

Als Antwort auf Andy

I should really tag @adamconover if I link to his stuff. Don't tell him this, but we're planning to ask him for a blurb for our game when it's done.
Als Antwort auf Andy

I fucking love Adam. I wondered where he went. Thanks!


[long] Some tests of how much AI "understands" what it says (spoiler: very little)


Als Antwort auf diz

Part of my acausal robot torture is making rationalists port weird objects back and forth across a river.


Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 30 June 2024


Als Antwort auf self

ah yes, flashbacks to when they bought pocket and instantly forced it on everyone

where you had to remove the ui icon, untick shit in settings, and then STILL go into about:config to kill even more things there. which I just wanted to share, but then found that apparently at some point my old settings got nuked? or decommissioned or something? and others reinstated/introduced? because none of my changes for that are there anymore

sigh

also, their push to telemetry, to labs, to getting people to cohort into running things, them pushing selective bans on plugins because of legal pressure in countries, their absolutely fucking awful track record in spending their cashflow on utter and complete bullshit instead of actually improving the browser, ...

Als Antwort auf froztbyte

go into about:config to kill even more things there. which I just wanted to share


Well, looks like my custom pocket settings are preserved, if they're useful to anyone:

browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.section.highlights.includePocket             false   
extensions.pocket.api                                       0.0.0.0 
extensions.pocket.enabled                                   false   
extensions.pocket.onSaveRecs                                    false   
extensions.pocket.settings.test.panelSignUp                         v1  
extensions.pocket.showHome                                  false   
extensions.pocket.site                                      0.0.0.0 
services.sync.prefs.sync.browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.section.highlights.includePocket    false


NodeBB v4.0.0-alpha (aka ActivityPub alpha release)




The Solarpunk Conference is coming up


After writing Solarpunk Creatures, I decided to join forces with my co-authors to create a workshop at the Solarpunk Conference: Decentering Humans in Solarpunk. How would you create a society that sees other creatures not as things to be exploited or marginalized into extinction but valuable independent of their use to us?





2040 a hopeful and realistic Solarpunk movie about our future


I loved the Movie 2040 by Damon Gameau. It’s really hopeful and shows us it’s possible to have a better future, the most important message today.
I especially also like the focus to be on kids, because those are the people that will be living in and shaping the future.
So watch this movie, show it to your kids and anyone who could benefit from a little more hope and Ideas!!
Als Antwort auf Julian_1_2_3_4_5

"In 2040, I'll reminisce about the 20th century,

When we still wrote on pads of paper, humans still did all the cleaning." - 2040, Spymob

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Jahr her)


Michaela hat dies geteilt.