mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

At #39c3 I used

✅ Toilet for Women only
✅ Toilet for Men only
✅ Toilet for trans/nonbinary/intersex only
✅ Toilet for all genders

and nobody noticed or cared 🤷

(for those who did not attend, the vast majority of the toilets were "for all genders")

#39c3
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Woche her)
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag

mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Infoseepage

FYI, the French don't seem nearly as obsessed with this phony shit. Granted, their public restrooms are almost universally terrible, but there are pissoirs everywhere and I pissed in a unisex communal lavatory at a market the other day where the alignment of the hand washing station allowed anyone washing their hands a full view down the line of people pissing in urinals. I used the urinals anyways as both of the actual toilets in the place had no seats or toilet paper.
Als Antwort auf sven_aus_kiel

friendica (DFRN) - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Jaddy

@sven_aus_kiel Yes and no. Toilets on planes and trains are normally single rooms, complete with sink and everything, with separate doors to the hallway/corridor. This is the perfect form.

In contrast “mass toilets" in event locations have a single door, shared space for hand washing and a second room with stalls and pissoirs, mostly behind a „bottle-neck“ passage.

This means that in the mass toilet, you’re separated from the hallway and main rooms, behind a single door, alone with some strangers and narrow ways. This can feel unsafe.

Since the main characteristic that connects all problematic people is “cis male,” it makes sense to at least offer an alternative for all non-cis male individuals.

It may seem strange at first, but “all gender” plus “FINTA*” is actually the most sensible thing you can do with classic gender segregated rooms without making any alterations.

@Ryan Castellucci (they/them)

@Ryan Castellucci (they/them) @sven_aus_kiel
⇧