Gute Zusammenstellung, danke! Nur eine Frage und eine Anmerkung:

- Für iOS werden ja meistens die Apps Ivory und Ice Cubes empfohlen. Warum tauchen sie nicht in deinen Empfehlungen auf?
- Ich finde die von dir empfohlenen Personen etwas willkürlich ausgewählt - dort sowie bei den Politikern sehe ich auch einen Männerüberhang. Mir fehlt u. a. @evawolfangel , die hier sehr präsent ist und Großartiges leistet.

Die toxischen, gier- und machtgetriebenen (a)sozialen Netzwerke müssen verboten werden. Reglementieren wird nicht funktionieren, weil sie dann für die Betreiber unattraktiv sind. Sie funktionieren nur mit Hass und Spaltung, deshalb wird das dort gefördert.

X und Meta gehören auf den Müllhaufen der Geschichte, wo zukünftige Generationen sie dann kopfschüttelnd bewundern können.

@derthomas Wer mehr als zwei Hirnzellen hat, volljährig und in absoluter Finsternis unterwegs ist, der Unterschätzt nicht mehr. Das ist Ignoranz.

Das ist Ignoranz der Marke "ich bin aus dem 13. Stock gefallen und komme gerade am 1 OG vorbei. Bisher ist doch alles gut gegangen"

@franzmari @amanda But do you see how you mansplained to us on a post about mansplaining?

How would you know what platform is the worst vs not when you're not the recipient of such things?

Why is the first urge to explain something to me, for example, under a post where I'm describing my experience with mansplaining. You could, for example, have asked me whether other platforms are better in my experience, rather than jumping in to mansplain.

I'm sorry, but I don't see it.
I never said/implied I know better than you and I never said/implied what you wrote was wrong (in fact, I boosted it before replying: why would I boost something I disagree with or think is wrong?)

What I meant with my post is that I was under the impression that there was no place where the level of mansplaining wasn't crazy high, but I wasn't pushing it as The Truth, nor I thought it was more relevant than your experience.

[1/2]

Maybe @amanda understood that and replied to me without blaming me (and I really appreciate that, btw).

Certainly I could have phrased my post better, and I am very sorry I wasn't able to deliver my message in the right way and that that made you think I was dismissing your experience.

I hope there are no hard feelings, as I really respect you and your work.

Next time I'll try to do better.

[2/2]

@ErickaSimone *quickly reads through your replies*

Well, you seem to express highly political opinions on the most populated instance in fediverse with the most active local feed.

So the only feasible thing would be to move to one of small instances. For example music related ones. That way you will limit your exposure to peers and it'll get more pleasant. It's up to you to make up social bubbles you participate in on this platform.

/pun intended

@timnitGebru

@bano
So what you're saying in the background there is that women shouldn't have opinions about politics and if they do it's reasonable that they be punished for it?

Also what pun?

@ErickaSimone @timnitGebru

@econads no, there's no background thought on my side. It's just the fact that you come to crowded place like a train station and give a table and two chairs and start saying something. You'll definitely get someone to join your table and say something to you. But if you want to have some civil conversation you want to limit potential opponents to the ones that you know can say something interesting and not any junky

I also don't really a fuck if someone online is woman or man, it doesn't matter.

@ErickaSimone @timnitGebru

@bano @econads @ErickaSimone

Lol, "I don't see color" energy.

Q: Where does a mansplainer get his water?

A: From a well, actually

a friend published a whole book titled "Your Hate-Mail will be graded."

I'm down for name-and-shame-and-display on the mansplaining, if you're interested in making the effort.

guess you have. not only you.

(there really lacks a
man splaining
command in each and every manual of this f***king world)