@aral If you want to make normal working-class people really aggressive and make them battle-ready for the communist revolt of the proletariat, send them this:
vinay.sh/i-am-rich-and-have-no…
The "capitalism-loving" clown who desperately wants to be like Elon, who sold his company Loom to Atlassian for almost a billion dollars, never again has to work a single day in his life, broke up with his girlfriend for no reason other than being a toxic moron, and now has not a single fucking idea what to do with his life now that he won capitalism (other than trying to climb a mountain in the Himalayas with zero mountaineering experience, of course, and very likely endangering some Sherpas).
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (7 Monate her)
![I think it’s right to not assume perfect competency. So from an information technology standpoint, how easily could we tip from a flawless flow of payments into something broken? I think the operational risks, they’re so multi-varied, even trying to come up with an answer of how many, it’s like where do you start. Maybe the first is introducing non-native technology. Technology goes through a rigorous process to be used by the federal government, it’s checked for various safety issues. How many more years did people like Obama use BlackBerrys when everyone, including CEOs, were using iPhones? There’s a very rigorous process for making technology safe and secure. Obviously none of that process is happening. The organization responsible for doing that [the U.S. Digital Service] has been gutted and turned into a meme.
As I discuss in the piece, there are systems that are run in parallel between older and newer versions to make sure the same answers are coming out. We're talking about systems where for years, both systems have been putting out correct data but not shutting down one because of edge cases where the data could be different. Only after years of work, they’ll shut down the older system. When you're running old and new systems in tandem, you're incurring both costs. My central terror, although there are a million ones you can pick, is that based on Musk’s history, the redundancies which are the premise of mission-critical IT systems ...](https://friend.enby-box.de/photo/preview/640/2828653 "I think it’s right to not assume perfect competency. So from an information technology standpoint, how easily could we tip from a flawless flow of payments into something broken? I think the operational risks, they’re so multi-varied, even trying to come up with an answer of how many, it’s like where do you start. Maybe the first is introducing non-native technology. Technology goes through a rigorous process to be used by the federal government, it’s checked for various safety issues. How many more years did people like Obama use BlackBerrys when everyone, including CEOs, were using iPhones? There’s a very rigorous process for making technology safe and secure. Obviously none of that process is happening. The organization responsible for doing that [the U.S. Digital Service] has been gutted and turned into a meme.
As I discuss in the piece, there are systems that are run in parallel between older and newer versions to make sure the same answers are coming out. We're talking about systems where for years, both systems have been putting out correct data but not shutting down one because of edge cases where the data could be different. Only after years of work, they’ll shut down the older system. When you're running old and new systems in tandem, you're incurring both costs. My central terror, although there are a million ones you can pick, is that based on Musk’s history, the redundancies which are the premise of mission-critical IT systems ...")
#
- 
Aral Balkan
Als Antwort auf David Culley • • •