Trump hat Kinder von Epstein versteigert - Irre Dokumente aufgetaucht
Die Medien in diesem Beitrag werden Besuchern nicht angezeigt. Um sie anzusehen, gehe bitte zum Originalbeitrag.
„Gehe zu cyberghostvpn.com/SaschaPallen… um 83 % Rabatt bei unserem Sponsor CyberGhost VPN zu erhalten – plus 4 Monate gratis!“
Unterstuetzt mich direkt:
youtube.com/channel/UCqboxXgo9…
Support via Paypal 👉 https://t.ly/paypalle
Support via Wero 👉 https://t.ly/weropalle
Mein Shop 👉 https://t.ly/PallesShop
Unsere Community 👉https://t.ly/PallesEK
Meinen Tech-Newsletter abonnieren 👉 https://t.ly/Abonnieren
Mein Mastodon Konto 👉 mastodon.social/@pallenberg
Hinweis: Bei den im Rahmen dieses Videos verwendeten Thumbnails kann es sich um Bildmaterial handeln, das ganz oder in Teilen mittels AI generiert oder nachbearbeitet wurde. Ebenfalls setze ich AI-Tools fuer die Uebersetzung und/oder Untertitel ein
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Stunden her)
JackDark
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
negativenull
Als Antwort auf JackDark • • •Ruigaard
Als Antwort auf JackDark • • •artifex
Als Antwort auf JackDark • • •theskyisfalling
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
Feddinat0r
Als Antwort auf theskyisfalling • • •This!!!
My highlight was the non lightening brake lights on electric cars when they are recuperating
halcyoncmdr
Als Antwort auf Feddinat0r • • •classic
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •mögen das
riot mag das.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble
Als Antwort auf classic • • •Obinice
Als Antwort auf fuckwit_mcbumcrumble • • •mögen das
riot und classic mögen das.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble
Als Antwort auf Obinice • • •keyez
Als Antwort auf fuckwit_mcbumcrumble • • •fuckwit_mcbumcrumble
Als Antwort auf keyez • • •Crozekiel
Als Antwort auf keyez • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
troglodytis
Als Antwort auf Crozekiel • • •MrShankles
Als Antwort auf fuckwit_mcbumcrumble • • •Hahahahaha, funny interwebs person being a sarcastic edge! Such fresh comedic material, I've never encountered before
Or maybe for some things, you just shouldn't... you're only hurting yourself in the end
There's a time and place for things, and garnering the wisdom to find the subtleties of that is something you should probably work on
Or continue forth being destructive for the lols and self-gratification, you're hilarious — truly. Enjoy the dopamine hit while it lasts!
Big edit: sorry @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble ... I got whooshed hard. I now see that yes, the tldw is indeed "They're lying". I feel a little dumb now, as I thought you meant the youtuber was lying; not that you had (super) summarized the subject. Very concise tldw, technically lol
Guess the video triggered me into also being tired of people lying, and thought you were being disinformative. My bad friend
kibiz0r
Als Antwort auf classic • • •First hour: Developing a detailed intuition for exactly how solar and wind energy work and what makes them so much better than oil (without mentioning climate change or pollution)
Last 30 min: Establishing a baseline moral framework that everyone can get behind, and explaining that under this framework a revolution against the Trump regime would be entirely justified but at a minimum we absolutely must vote against Republicans in the 2026 and 2028 elections.
As someone in the comments put it: he explains solar and then goes nuclear.
mögen das
Badabinski und HarkMahlberg mögen das.
Obinice
Als Antwort auf kibiz0r • • •rainwall
Als Antwort auf Obinice • • •balsoft
Als Antwort auf classic • • •I think all the information is pretty well-known in this community, but here's a summary:
- Renewables (specifically solar + batteries) are an inevitable future of energy production due to technological advancements and economies of scale improvements; you should not oppose them but welcome them
- We are at a tipping point where solar + batteries is now the cheapest energy source available
- Land use for solar farms is not a big issue, they are much more energy efficient per unit area than the ethanol corn that currently plagues the US
- Replacing all ethanol corn fields with solar farms would make almost twice as much energy as the US grid is currently producing
- Renewables are better than fossil fuels because they do not require continuous extraction; when a solar panel or battery has been "used up" and is degraded, it can be recycled, whereas fossil fuels can only be burned once after extraction
- The end goal is an almost-closed-loop system for all energy production, similar to what we have with lead-acid batte
... mehr anzeigenI think all the information is pretty well-known in this community, but here's a summary:
Alec's personal views are a relief, I think it's a shame he didn't go deeper into them before (IIRC he had a video where he called out right-wing misinfo but stopped short of any direct calls for action). I suppose the contrast between his usual "tech presenter/science explainer" and this clearly righteous political call for action might get through to some people better.
mögen das
Badabinski und HarkMahlberg mögen das.
AWistfulNihilist
Als Antwort auf balsoft • • •balsoft
Als Antwort auf AWistfulNihilist • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
oce 🐆
Als Antwort auf balsoft • • •balsoft
Als Antwort auf oce 🐆 • • •WagnasT
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •watches video
oh.
mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
Cort
Als Antwort auf WagnasT • • •Isn't that just the standard format for technology connections?
Looks at runtime
Oh, this is gonna be a good one!
Korhaka
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •Not finished it yet but it annoys me so much that for some reason it is VASTLY cheaper for me to buy a briefcase or two full of batteries for my house than it is for the same to be done in bulk at the scale of the grid.
Just batteries would cut my energy costs to about a third of their current rate by charging them at cheaper off peak prices. Isn't it insane that this is a feature of the current energy market?
Cort
Als Antwort auf Korhaka • • •Mike D
Als Antwort auf Cort • • •Cort
Als Antwort auf Mike D • • •humanspiral
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •undersells the advantage of solar over corn ethanol land use by a lot. At least 2x. Excluding high energy/equipment cost of fermenting ethanol, overstating mileage, and understating EV mileage. The point of ethanol is purely to pay farmers for useless work, but they can make far more with less work from solar. Corn farmers in US have lost money for 4 consecutive years. Excluding land costs, their costs is $650/acre/year, excluding their time/labour. Cashflow per acre $97 @ $4/bushel. At 2.5 hours/day for $30/hour, profit before rent-equivalent drops to $22/acre
In Nebraska, solar costs $1/watt to install (before recent permitting BS). China costs $0.50/w (no tariffs, cheaper construction services/equipment). An acre in Nebraska can hold 400kw of solar, and produce 630k kwh/year (edit: correction). It breaks even at 5c/kwh with 5% financing of whole installation (with system paid off in 25 years, even though it keeps producing) including $4000 O&M costs (high, because its washing dust and leaves 1-2 times per week). Every 1c/kwh revenue higher is $6300/acre profit,
... mehr anzeigenundersells the advantage of solar over corn ethanol land use by a lot. At least 2x. Excluding high energy/equipment cost of fermenting ethanol, overstating mileage, and understating EV mileage. The point of ethanol is purely to pay farmers for useless work, but they can make far more with less work from solar. Corn farmers in US have lost money for 4 consecutive years. Excluding land costs, their costs is $650/acre/year, excluding their time/labour. Cashflow per acre $97 @ $4/bushel. At 2.5 hours/day for $30/hour, profit before rent-equivalent drops to $22/acre
In Nebraska, solar costs $1/watt to install (before recent permitting BS). China costs $0.50/w (no tariffs, cheaper construction services/equipment). An acre in Nebraska can hold 400kw of solar, and produce 630k kwh/year (edit: correction). It breaks even at 5c/kwh with 5% financing of whole installation (with system paid off in 25 years, even though it keeps producing) including $4000 O&M costs (high, because its washing dust and leaves 1-2 times per week). Every 1c/kwh revenue higher is $6300/acre profit,
Since ethanol is just a gift to farmers/rural land owners. Giving them 2%/financing rate as the gift and 4c/kwh in revenue is the same profit per acre, and at 5c/kwh, massively higher ($6300) profit. For US car drivers, instead of paying $0.12/mile (a 25mpg gasoline car will use 5.4 gallons ethanol/100 miles at $2.20/gallon). 18c/kwh charging for EV means $0.05/mile. Massive cost reduction already, but tariffs and other BS removal can provide significantly more value for farmers and drivers.
humanspiral
Als Antwort auf humanspiral • • •stabby_cicada
Als Antwort auf humanspiral • • •God, fuck ethanol. Last I checked it literally took 1.5 gallons of oil/gas to produce 1 gallon of ethanol. It turns more fuel into less fuel and pisses away soil fertility doing it.
I read an article some time ago arguing the purpose of ethanol (and ag subsidies in general) is, consciously or unconsciously, manifest destiny - we have to have a "use" for all the land we stole, we have to do something with it even if that something is a complete waste, because otherwise, people might start asking why we don't give it back. Seems more likely to me all the time.
humanspiral
Als Antwort auf stabby_cicada • • •It's the power of a voting class. Origins are geopolitics of 70s oil crisis. Then vote buying of rural areas. Most of the legislative giveaways were titled "clean air something". There is a food security argument for grains (livestock is a food battery, and ethanol is surplus monetization)
There is a high oil-related cost portion of corn farming. Close to $300 of the $650/acre is fertilizer ($225), tractor fuel, pesticides. The last 4 years of corn farming losses is also during low NG price. The minimal profit before rent-equivalence can go negative at higher NG price, because ethanol is only blended into gasoline when gasoline is expensive, and then corn only bought for cheap when it is not. The US always has a high oil price policy, and geopolitical insecurity to achieve it. Weapons-oil industry is deep state establishment pushing for war and higher oil prices, and more corn helps, and politicians are rewarded with larger bribery war chests.
Energy insecurity for Americans comes from relying on geopolitical manipulated energy subscription to live/operate. Farmers nee
... mehr anzeigenIt's the power of a voting class. Origins are geopolitics of 70s oil crisis. Then vote buying of rural areas. Most of the legislative giveaways were titled "clean air something". There is a food security argument for grains (livestock is a food battery, and ethanol is surplus monetization)
There is a high oil-related cost portion of corn farming. Close to $300 of the $650/acre is fertilizer ($225), tractor fuel, pesticides. The last 4 years of corn farming losses is also during low NG price. The minimal profit before rent-equivalence can go negative at higher NG price, because ethanol is only blended into gasoline when gasoline is expensive, and then corn only bought for cheap when it is not. The US always has a high oil price policy, and geopolitical insecurity to achieve it. Weapons-oil industry is deep state establishment pushing for war and higher oil prices, and more corn helps, and politicians are rewarded with larger bribery war chests.
Energy insecurity for Americans comes from relying on geopolitical manipulated energy subscription to live/operate. Farmers need export markets, which makes it good for them for US to not be hated by all of their markets. US oligarchy is also invested in high electricity prices/profits for incumbents. Datacenter bubble is ideal oligarchism alliance with tech.
The point of my post is that farming/rural areas can be weaned from the oil oligarchy voting block. Much cleaner air argument. Genuine energy security that comes from 0 reliance on future geopolitics/supply chains. Better corn prices if some corn farmers switch to solar. Lower oil prices if less of it is wasted on farming and cars. Lower electricity prices and abundance to fund whatever skynet priority to better kill us all, but without us going broke first.
Spaceballstheusername
Als Antwort auf humanspiral • • •humanspiral
Als Antwort auf Spaceballstheusername • • •mindbleach
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •"That's it. That's the end of the video. Don't look at the timestamp, don't--"
*Always Sunny music*
Alec Gets Radicalized
mögen das
Badabinski und osaerisxero mögen das.
SubArcticTundra
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •Damage
Als Antwort auf SubArcticTundra • • •WoodScientist
Als Antwort auf Damage • • •BradleyUffner
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •SubArcticTundra
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •HarkMahlberg
Als Antwort auf SubArcticTundra • • •bdonvr
Als Antwort auf HarkMahlberg • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
GreeNRG
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
Subtracty
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •ProdigalFrog
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •Technology Connections
YouTubeWoodScientist
Als Antwort auf ProdigalFrog • • •HarkMahlberg
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •Netux
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •mindbleach
Als Antwort auf Netux • • •bdonvr
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •mindbleach
Als Antwort auf GreeNRG • • •ltxrtquq
Als Antwort auf mindbleach • • •Doomsider
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •Great video. Completely breaks down the argument. You already knew this of you had been paying attention. Oil/gas for electricity generation in any form is DOA. It is insanely more expensive than solar + battery.
Not to mention destructive to the environment and politically fraught with issues.
To think if our government went all in it could provide dirt cheap limitless energy that would not cause lung disease or wars is staggering.
mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
muusemuuse
Als Antwort auf Doomsider • • •gandalf_der_12te
Als Antwort auf muusemuuse • • •untorquer
Als Antwort auf gandalf_der_12te • • •WorldsDumbestMan
Als Antwort auf untorquer • • •untorquer
Als Antwort auf WorldsDumbestMan • • •It's capitalism, power is wealth by definition. These are compatible concepts.
By perceived value i mean speculation.
mirshafie
Als Antwort auf untorquer • • •They use the aesthetics of capitalism to intellectualize and explain why we should not question their supremacy.
In reality, capitalism does not in any way justify monopolization of natural resources, or the large-scale destruction of the environment.
Capitalism is the ideology of thr petit-bourgeoisie, not the actual bourgeoisie. They are just social-darwinists.
untorquer
Als Antwort auf mirshafie • • •I do not understand what this adds to the concept of capitalism other than introducing the term "social darwinism".
There is no difference between "the aesthetics" of capitalism and its actualization, and neither base a capitalist's actions in regard to benefitting society beyond "the market". Capitalism is simply the current method of accruing power for someone to push their personal ideology on others. It just happens that the most effective method to exploit capitalism is to reject any sense of empathy or consideration for anything external or internal, especially flesh and blood humans because they are the only real threat to your power.
ZombiFrancis
Als Antwort auf untorquer • • •gandalf_der_12te
Als Antwort auf untorquer • • •untorquer
Als Antwort auf gandalf_der_12te • • •IronBird
Als Antwort auf gandalf_der_12te • • •pedz
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •As someone not from the US, I can't say how much I appreciate the last part of his video. As much as I understand why YouTubers want to "keep politics out of entertainment", it's disappointing and makes me lose interest in some US content because it seems like they are ignoring what's going on around them.
And about the batteries, that's unfortunately an argument I sometimes hear from skeptics. "What are we going to do with all those batteries?" they ask. I explain that they can mostly be recycled and like to ask what are we going to do with all the CO2 in the air, but apparently it's different. Ironically one of those persons is my father, that has a cabin with a solar system that I installed for him. He originally bought a generator but since it's very noisy to run only for some lights, he prefers using the battery bank powered by a few solar panels on the roof. I'd show him this video but he doesn't speak English and it's probably a lost cause anyway.
We can only hope that at least a few people can be influenced by this video; both parts.
mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
Cort
Als Antwort auf pedz • • •For what it's worth, ALL technology connections videos have manually added English closed captions, not auto generated gibberish.
It's some of the best captioning work I've ever seen. He actually takes the time to sync them to the auto/video, prevents spoiling jokes/punchlines, and adds an Easter egg at the end of most episodes (usually describing the smooth jazz outro).
You might actually have decent luck using the subtitle translation feature built into YouTube, since it (machine) translates the actual words Alec is saying.
mögen das
HarkMahlberg mag das.
mirshafie
Als Antwort auf Cort • • •Alec is awesome. The content he makes isn't really my cup of tea, but I recognize that that man has some serious game.
I don't find his videos to be entertaining, but they're so educational that I watch them anyway.
captainlezbian
Als Antwort auf Cort • • •Deebster
Als Antwort auf Cort • • •acargitz
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •gandalf_der_12te
Als Antwort auf acargitz • • •it still needs to be explained carefully though
like to a child you still have to explain how to read a clock or how to tie their shoes even though it's common sense. and you have to be patient while explaining it.
acargitz
Als Antwort auf gandalf_der_12te • • •I didn't write "common sense" to imply it doesn't need to be explained.
I wrote it to mean that once explained, it clearly is impossible to refute because it's common sense.
My comment was not adversarial.
VibeSurgeon
Als Antwort auf acargitz • • •bdonvr
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •MidsizedSedan
Als Antwort auf bdonvr • • •October1
Als Antwort auf MidsizedSedan • • •mavu
Als Antwort auf bdonvr • • •Did they break him...? Or did they set him free? :D
(was going to go with "unleashed" but that carries a different vibe not fitting to this serious cause :) )
Baggie
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •solo
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •I have watched only a few minutes of this vid so far, as well as the timestamps and I must admit I don't agree with this approach because of something I learned today.
He says around 2 m something like: the strategic US reserve of oil even tho the number of barrels sounds huge, they could sustain the US only a month of our current use. From the context my understanding is that he implies that this is due to casual, everyday-people consumption.
Well, it looks like the Department of Defense is the U.S. government’s largest fossil fuel consumer, accounting for between 77% and 80% of all federal government energy consumption since 2001. So why is this huge percentage missing from this long analysis?
Anyways, if he talks about the US military petroleum consumption, please let me know. Or if I got something wrong with this new info I got about the US military, let me know too.
You are being misled about renewable energy technology.
Technology Connections (YouTube)TammyTobacco
Als Antwort auf solo • • •You're right, we shouldn't electrify and should keep using fossil fuels.
whvholst
Als Antwort auf solo • • •solo
Als Antwort auf whvholst • • •According to a factcheck site it looks like the U.S. Oil Reserve Created for Supply Disruptions, Not Strictly Military Use. So maybe your statement is wrong? Otherwise could you share the source you got this from?
I don't understand what you are saying, could you please explain and/or share a relevant link? Btw maybe I should clarify that by talking about "consumption" I was not talking in economic terms, just in the sense of "utilizing".
U.S. Oil Reserve Created for Supply Disruptions, Not Strictly Military Use - FactCheck.org
Nora Macaluso (FactCheck.org)WoodScientist
Als Antwort auf solo • • •muelltonne
Als Antwort auf solo • • •captainlezbian
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •That rant at the end really sums up my feelings as a Midwestern leftist. Hell the whole thing does honestly. But you treat people right, you make prudent decisions, and you treat labor with dignity and respect.
I also really respect him for accepting when something that had been obvious to him (the value proposition of solar and electrification) turned out to have not been obvious to others so he cut the snark and explained his reasoning. It's an admirable display of character. But also, yeah it had been obvious to me as well.
Probably not my favorite video of his, but definitely rhe one I respect the most
VibeSurgeon
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •Just when I thought I couldn't like him more, he goes and drops this gigabased rant.
TC for U.S president honestly
Phoenixz
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •lemmydividebyzero
Als Antwort auf Phoenixz • • •Sam_Bass
Als Antwort auf negativenull • • •